1)The chances of contracting an STD from him are small. How many partners could he have had? Especially true for a virgin. I don’t recommend having unprotected sex without testing him for STDs first, but this is the safest person to have it with.
2)He’ll be really happy about it. You will get to very positively and strongly affect someone’s life and feel like a good person.
3)No one can make you feel as desirable and valuable as a sex-starved guy who is really desperate. If alpha men use you and don’t appreciate what you have to give, someone else will appreciate it.
4)Incel guys sometimes commit suicide out of hopelessness. And sometimes, but rarely, go Sodini. Think about it – you might be saving lives by fucking an omega.
5)They are often willing to reward you with commitment very easily. If having an omega around doesn’t sound very pleasant, know that you can introduce them to red pill knowledge and teach them to take charge of their life and become more confident. If this works out, you’re their proof that NAWALT, which is good for relationship strength. On the other hand, if it doesn’t work out, you’re stuck with a needy guy. If you can’t cope with that, make sure you pick one that isn’t interested in a relationship.
6)If you’re a woman who’s been fucking like a man, why not fuck TRULY like a man – for variety? Men sometimes fuck old women, fat women, dwarf women, and every type of women, just because they value sexual variety. They don’t all pounce on the perfect models only, so why would you?
7)They can actually often be normal, handsome men. Nothing wrong with them at all. They can have some flaws, like some social awkwardness, or low-paying job, or blue pill deludedness, but the last one is fixable and the rest isn’t all that bad. They just tend to be too normal and not eye-catching, but since when is normal too ugly to have sex with?
Hahaha this is hilarious!!! Just for this you deserve to be on our blogroll. I need to read back and find where you swallowed the red pill to understand the true dynamics of men and women!!
Thanks, I’m glad you enjoyed the post
And thank you for adding my link.
Perhaps I need to write how I found the red pill. The reason I have avoided it, was because a lot of it is already known to Norwegians visitors of this site from the newspapers. In short, many things were already known to me from experience, but they only because solid knowledge once I met an MRA and entered a relationship with him. Then I tried to find out how things really are, and read a lot of material.
1) Irrelevant, most women will use protection anyway.
2) Most women won’t care and, unfortunately, the fact is that those who do might be getting themselves in messy situations for one important reason. These women will fuck them once or twice and than go back to alphas. However, omegas and lesser betas rarely have chances and will go and and pursue the woman even after she rejects more sexual encounters, bringing suffering to themselves, annoyance to the woman and possibly even legal consequences.
3)Maybe, but most never leave alphas anyway and go back to them.
4)Most women won’t care. Liberalism has created the a false dogma where incel is caused by mental diseases and is solvable by therapy. Every incel suicide and murder-suicide will be seen as a mental problem, not incel problem. In fact, it will be seen as a good reason why the incel was avoided in his lifetime. Intelligent women like you realize the truth but they are a tiny minority.
5)OK, but you mention the potential problems yourself-
6) Haha, interesting reason… Still, most women are dull enough to be completely satsified my monotonously fucking alphas.
7) Not many women realize that. Most still go back to alphas.
Depressing, but true.
Yes, I know “women won’t care about this” and “don’t know that”, that’s why I wrote the post
. It says what a woman can get out of it. And just because society thinks sexual frustration is a sign of mental illness, doesn’t mean it should continue to do that (4) ).
And yes, there are potential drawbacks with omegas too, which are what you mention (2) ). Even if he won’t stalk you, he might fall in love. If you want commitment, you might get it big time. In that case, you better be prepared to either date an omega and help him get more confident&balanced, OR pick one that can’t fall in love, or not with you, but would gladly take the sex. It could be a guy already in love with someone else, or you’re too fat/ugly for him, or something. Reading your stories, I noticed a few girls that you thought were kinda ugly, for example.. Would you fall in love with them if they offered a FWB arrangement?.. I’m curious if my assumptions could be right.
1) is relevant. Condoms don’t protect against all diseases. You can still get HPV and a few others, I think.
Issue with 1. For every battery that a woman wastes on her new vibrator['s] I’ve met a woman not giving two shits about the lack of a condom. Moreso after using a condom it’s more likely she’s actually “on birth control” so it’s ok, in certain environments. Furthermore, I’ve known the condom-needing women (like, hey don’t you want me to use a condom?) were, in such a heated moment more trustworthy than the ones that convinced me they were on birth-control before I asked or had ones prepared. Far more women than you think willingly fuck without protection, because they know that, or expect that, due to their actual lack of sexual experience or clearly obvious exceedingly obvious amount of sexual experience, the person they rawdogwith is equivocal.
I don’t know if I want to say this or not, but if a girl suddenly wants you to wear condoms, and you didn’t need to before: she’s fucking other guys.
Back to this article: 2/3/4 actually is an interesting thing. I have something I can’t explain right now and I’ve often been warned about how I rant so I will get back to you. You brought up some very poignant things here.
I love you!!!
xx
haha ok *blush*
Emma & GGF:
Actually, most American women seem to prefer men who are even lower than ‘Omega’ status. ‘Alphas’ are more likely to be INCEL, divorced, or single than anybody else.
Emma’s right, though: most women won’t care about this—they can’t feel comfortable with ANY man unless he validates their feminist-inspired prejudices that all men are really subhuman.
Huh?
Alphas are not incel, no matter how poor and lazy they get.
“Emma’s right, though: most women won’t care about this—they can’t feel comfortable with ANY man unless he validates their feminist-inspired prejudices that all men are really subhuman.”
And when did I ever say that? Lol
Emma:
In my observations, men who are poor and lazy (and also violent, mentally unstable, and unhygenic) will never be INCEL, whether they are ‘alphas’ or not. What I meant was that men who show genuine and positive ‘alpha’ traits like courage, confidence, and responsibility are completely invisible to most women.
‘And when did I ever say that?’
You did say that most women wouldn’t care about your advice. LOL The second part is the kind of advice most women eagerly follow!
Ah, you can correct me, but it seems to me you are defining alpha according to what men find admirable. I was talking along the lines of who gets the most women, or who is most popular among them. My list is really about woman-defined omegas – those guys that are ok guys, but not chosen for sex or relationships.
Maybe most women (or even people) won’t care about my list to begin with, but it won’t hurt to make it known
It should offer a new perspective.
What is INCEL?
It’s a guy who can’t get laid. Usually because no one will have him.
Emma:
‘You are defining alpha along the lines of what men find admirable.’
True; however…
‘I was talking along the lines of who gets the most women, or who is most popular among them.’
The question then being: why don’t women find admirable traits in men desirable? Specifically ‘Ok guys who are not chosen for sex or relationships.’
This is why I tend to believe that women typically do NOT choose valuable men; because women themselves do NOT value males.
“The question then being: why don’t women find admirable traits in men desirable? ”
I guess like a lot of people, women go for sexy to have sex, rather than admirable. Men go for sexy to have sex too, but for them, what’s sexy is different.
“This is why I tend to believe that women typically do NOT choose valuable men; because women themselves do NOT value males.”
Interesting, but I’m not sure I follow. Can you explain?
Emma:
‘Women go for sexy to have sex, rather than admirable.’
What women appear to find sexy are hardly males to whom they could have any genuine sexual attraction. I’ve actually come to disbelieve that most women ever really feel a sexual attraction towards men, after I’ve seen the kinds of men who generally attract them.
This leads into what I mentioned about not valuing men. Feminist society has taught women that men are essentially stupid, useless, expendable, and only thinking of sex constantly. Women are also taught that they are the superior of men in every conceivable way. It follows that, after such an upbringing, they would never be able to relate to men as anything other than inferiors. Of course, they will reject any male to whom they don’t feel a sense of superiority.
In other words, to most women a relationship is simply about ego-validation and is rarely, if ever, founded on sexual attraction or love. The only reason they want men at all is to validate their own sense of superiority and to prove to themselves that their lack of sexual feeling is not outright frigidity (which it generally is).
“What women appear to find sexy are hardly males to whom they could have any genuine sexual attraction”
Just because you can’t imagine why they are attracted to these guys, doesn’t mean they are not. You know men and women are not attracted to the same things.
I will have to disagree with you
Ideology can change one’s attitude, but it can’t just wipe out sexual selection. When ideology and nature clash, the latter often wins. Toxic ideology can affect people in negative ways, but they remain human. It might result in the same person housing contradicting views, which they won’t notice until you point it out to them.
Emma:
I know that men and women are not attracted to the same things, but consider this: a man may be attracted to young, nubile women and there is a directly biogical reason for that. But recently, there was a story in the news about a martial-arts instructor who risked his life by swimming into a raging river to save some children’s lives. I don’t see or hear of women swooning over a man like that—a man of obvious courage who has strong paternal instincts.
But on the other hand, James Holmes, a scrawny, ugly little coward who perpetrated the Aurora Theatre Massacre is considered ‘one of the hottest men in America’ right now. This doesn’t make any sense from ANY perspective. No one would argue seriously that Holmes is superior to a man like the martial artist in the other story. Yet women want to line up and have Holmes’ baby while the better man is invisible to them!