The manosphere (at least the PUA part of it) has a reputation of being kind of shallow, rating women from 1 to 10, saying things that will make women freak out over tiny barely visible wrinkles, promising them they’ll hit the wall hard at 30… But despite that, I just don’t buy it. I observe many things that tell me that the manosphere men are not as terribly shallow as they let on.
Here’s a list of 9 Ugliest Feminists in America. Made by Roosh. To be honest with you, some of them are not all that ugly.
The fat one is just fat.
And Jessica Valenti is probably the prettiest of the people on the list, but I wouldn’t rate myself above her judging just by looks.
Others have some flaws in their faces, but nobody is disgusting to look at. I could probably find much uglier feminists if I could see them all.
Although I’m sure Roosh finds these women ugly quite honestly, RooshV forum has this thread. It’s a thread about 40-something women, with lots of pictures. Some guys responded saying they are not hot enough, but many said something along the lines of “I would smash most of them”. Some even said that most men wouldn’t refuse, if one of these women walked over to them and offered sex. Yet most of them don’t look younger than their age, and aren’t perfect beauties. They just look like they take care of themselves, and dress hot. One man said:
“I’d put all these chicks through a wall from banging them so hard. There’s something about an older chick that’s just way more seductive than a younger girl. They’re not nearly as hot, but there’s an intangible factor of fuckability present that is just not seen in many 20 year olds.”
Also, there were times when some sweet, non- manhating women showed their faces in the manosphere, and did NOT receive any bashing of their looks, despite being plain or old.
I’m convinced of two things.
One. Inner beauty matters very much. Pleasant character and good morals will take you far, if you’re only a 5. It might not make a man attracted to you, if you don’t pass his boner test. But if you pass it, good character will add to your appeal. And bad character will subtract from it greatly. This is, in my opinion, especially true for girls in the middle of the SMV scale, 4-7.
Two. Most women (and men) are pleasant looking. Or can be. Fitness, good clothes and taking care of yourself properly means pleasant looks for pretty much anyone, except the truly deformed people and 1s on the SMV scale. There is no reason to worry about being ugly if you’re just normal. Look at rabbits in the forest. Very few of them are weird-looking or deformed, and it’s the same with humans.
However, knowing you aren’t ugly doesn’t mean shooting out of your league is a great idea. Manosphere men often tell women to settle if they want to be happy, but I hate that word. It shouldn’t be called settle. It should be called seeing beauty where you were blind to it previously. Just like most women are pleasant looking, so are most men. We’re just nitpicking too much in both.
So, if the manosphere guys are not so shallow, why do they attack the looks of women they don’t like? Well, I have an idea. I think they do it because it works, and don’t mind fighting dirty.
It doesn’t work because it’s used all the time, it’s used all the time because it works.
I once called a woman a slut for being a bitch to me, because it still works on many women, even if they deny it. I don’t actually slut-shame, and don’t look down on promiscuity per se.
So… stop worrying about impossible beauty standards. Event the manosphere guys don’t have them. They are relevant nowhere, except maybe Hollywood and modeling. Take care of your looks, have great character, and see beauty in others.