Manosphere has a new rising star – LaidNYC (http://laidnyc.wordpress.com/ ). He’s famous for saying things like:
“In fact, Facebook shows that when women peak is even younger than anyone blogging under their real name would care to admit. Common red pill dogma states that women are their hottest between 18-24.
I say this is bullshit. Try 15-19.”
” Know that you are a depreciating asset to men in general. As your value to all men decreases, you must build your value to one well-chosen man by proving trustworthy over and over, being a source of feminine support, and being a producer and care-giver to his genetic spawn.”
“A year from now I will be richer and fitter and more socially respected in the Kingdom, but your beauty will have faded a notch. I demand that you treat me with the humility and respect that this biological reality dictates.”
“The lesson for men: Take a look at that gorgeous girl. She is a walking expiration date. Her power in this world is fleeting. She is the temporary head coach knowing he’s getting replaced at the end of the season.
Do not see her as a 20 year old hottie.
See her as a person.”
He comes across as kind of an arrogant jerk in a lot of his posts. However, he lives up to his own advice about treating a girl as a person. There are two types of manopshere jerks – biased and unbiased. The biased one seems incapable of taking in any new data, he just views everyone he interacts with through the same filter. The unbiased one treats people he interacts with individually, considers new data, even if previous theory still applies. Heck, the latter is hardly even a jerk, since he treats everyone relatively fairly. Needless to say, the latter gets my respect and the former doesn’t.
Due to all this offensive stuff LaidNYC has said, he has like a manboobz trackback on every page. Some funny comments from there stand out to me. Enjoy.
“I don’t see how a man in his thirties could find girls under the age of 20 sexually attractive. I really can’t.
I work with high school age girls everyday and can tell you that the average 16 year old girl looks like a kid. They don’t look sexy or hot. They look like undeveloped kids.”
Where’s he teaching – in a starving Asian country where people are underweight on average? Because if he looks at normal Western 16 year old girl and sees an underdeveloped kid, he needs glasses. But if that’s the case, he’s just parroting ideologically acceptable dogmas. Uh huh, Megan Fox is “skinny” and “boyish”, Marilyn Monroe was “plus-size”, and normal 16 year old girls are “underdeveloped kids”. What is he to believe – the ideology, or his lying eyes?
“The thing about “peak beauty” is that generally, those who are sexually attracted to people tend to on average be most sexually attracted to people of about the same age category. If you’re young, young people look hot. If you’re older, older people look hot. If you’re “middle-age”, then middle-age people are just the hottest thing ever.”
That comment is up there with the one about the 79-year old knockout on Dalrock’s site (http://dalrock.wordpress.com/2013/04/22/vox-explains-dalrocks-law/ ).