The Myth of the Unfuckability of Fat Girls

Sometimes, feminists stumble upon the truth. Sometimes this truth is something even the manosphere denies.

1.

“I remember the exact moment that the concept of someone finding me attractive became even a remote possibility. I was 20 years old (TWENTY), talking to a friend when they said with a snicker, “Can you believe Henry thinks you’re hot?!?”

This sentence came to me as a question because “Henry” was not one to be flattered by. He didn’t have girls lining up to date him and he didn’t possess any qualities of a good catch, but these details were lost on me. I was still shocked and stunned by the fact that ANY homosapien on this planet would find my body attractive.

Growing up, I felt so desexualized that the promise of any sort of physical appreciation was inconceivable, even in my future. Yet here I was. A male found me sexy. It was within this moment that my wheels started turning — and thus began my two-year stint with reckless and hedonistic debauchery.”

-Jes the Militant Baker, “Fat and Easy: Totally Not Synonyms”

It is strange to hear a woman tell her story of how she thought no one would ever want to fuck her, but I think it happens. Women can be deceived about how much sexual power they really have.

2.

Fat chicks bang hot guys… ALL. THE. TIME. I know that hot is relative and all inclusive depending on who you chat with, but for these purposes, lets talk about the “universally attractive” kind of hot. Y’know, the kind fat chicks don’t deserve? We want to pretend that we don’t know what I’m talking about, but lets be real; we totally do. The fact that “fat chicks bang ‘hot’ guys” was one of the most powerful realizations I’ve had thus far. In line with the above paragraph, I knew that there would be someone that would find me attractive but the pool would be small (because of my body) and potentially full of guys I didn’t personally find sexy. So I would have to settle for anyone that would take me. After all, how could a conventionally gorgeous man (tall and with tattoos of course) like fat chicks?  Weh-he-hell, let me tell you somethin’: through various sites, events, parties, and corner store meetings, I found myself with over a hundred men who were champing at the bit to get with this. I was the one who had to sift through and pick the hottest of the hot. Ladies, over a hundred. “Girls” showed what society thinks about that when Hannah’s character has a weekend romance with an attractive and wealthy doctor. People flipped their shit. “Patrick Wilson is so hot he would never do Lena Dunham” was the most eye catching.”

– Jes The Militant Baker, Things No One Will Tell Fat Girls… So I Will”

I agree, a doctor with Patrick Wilson’s looks would bang someone who looks like Lena Dunham. It’s totally plausible and not Hollywood fiction. Men lower their standard for sex, and increase them for marriage and serious relationships.

3.

I’m against rape. Unless it’s obsese women. How else are they going to get sweet, sweet cock?

People really say this shit.

Whether they really believe it is almost immaterial. The purpose of comments like these isn’t to argue sincerely that rapists are doing a favor to fat chicks; it’s to wound the fat woman or women at whom they’re directed, as deeply as possible. And it works, to the extent that it does (which depends on the person and the day), because too many of us fully believe the underlying premise on which that twisted leap of logic is based: No one wants to fuck a fatty.”

-Kate Harding, “How do you fuck a fat woman?”

Later, Kate Harding tells us about that time a male friend was giving her sensual backrubs and touched her boobs, but she was so convinced he couldn’t be attracted to her, that she never interpreted it as sexual attention. Also, note the illogical insult thrown her way by an internet troll. The correct way to insult a woman’s attractiveness is to say “The only way you’d get laid is by raping a guy”, not “The only way you’d get laid is by being raped”. The latter makes no sense. Unless, of course, you believe rapists rape for asexual reasons, that is for power and control, and never because he wants to use force to get sex. I think it can be concluded that the internet troll was quite obviously a feminist her-/himself.

And this is one rare time when feminists stumble upon the truth. Fat chicks are neither unfuckable nor unable to get sex from sexy men.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Fat, Feminism, Men, Politics and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

51 Responses to The Myth of the Unfuckability of Fat Girls

  1. Define “fat” though…? I feel like there are plenty of girls who think they’re fat because they’re supposedly ten or fifteen pounds overweight according to… some source, but meanwhile 90 percent of guys think she’s got the perfect body. How fat are we talking? Isn’t “fat” sometimes as subjective as “hot” is?

    • Well, the first and second link will tell you how fat the author of the first 2 articles is 🙂 I think she’s obese, not just 10-15 lbs overweight. So yes, in this article I’m talking about obese girls, not just slightly overweight ones.

    • Samson J. says:

      Define “fat” though…? I feel like there are plenty of girls who think they’re fat because they’re supposedly ten or fifteen pounds overweight according to

      You’re completely correct; I’ve noticed this time and again. It’s women who depress themselves about weight, talking about a difference of 10 pounds as if that is noticeable by anybody.

      The problem with the woman in the OP may not be the actual number on the scale; I find it hard to tell from the pictures. She is certainly overweight, but her real problem is simply that she isn’t pretty.

  2. Eric says:

    Fat chicks may not be incapable of sex (depending on whether or not the guy can reach, of course) or unable to get sex from sexy men, but…
    THEY AIN’T GETTING THIS ONE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!LOL

  3. theasdgamer says:

    A man who will fakk fatties may be tall, gorgeous, etc., but he won’t have any frame or sense of entitlement to attractive women. Such a man will have low self-esteem and be unattractive to attractive women. He will be too insecure to try to approach attractive women.

  4. CUCH says:

    It’s a poorly understood part of male attractive, but a large woman can look good if she has a good shape. My ex-wife is a large woman and always has been but she had the classic hourglass shape that was still obvious when she had put on lots of weight.

  5. Liz says:

    I think it has a lot to do with proportionality more than weight. But yes, I agree a fat woman can get laid. There are very few women who can’t. See Hugh Grant and Divine Brown. He was living with Liz Hurley for Christsake and actually paid for a piece of that.

    • Liz says:

      There was a case here at the base where a woman claimed rape after her husband found out she’d cheated. Well, she’d been texting her girlfriend (even during the process, “Hey, I’m naked and in bed with this guy….should I f*ck him? I’m mad at my husband…” “Hell yeah! gf! I’m in bed f*cking around on my man too! high five yo!”) so obviously it wasn’t rape. But the case was investigated and I know some people (men) who reviewed the evidence. One told me the most disturbing thing was the description of the clothing, which included size. This woman was gianormous. So, there you have it, what the sphere would say is a classic AFBB situation so that husband must be beta and that guy she was banging alpha, according to prevalent sphere logic. She was a heavy heavy hefter two-ply, banging “an alpha dude”.

      • theasdgamer says:

        Alphas will only mess with fatties if the alpha is very drunk and the fattie is very aggressive. Usually, only betas will fakk fatties.

      • Lol. That’s funny, but I’m glad the “alpha fucks” did not go to jail. I suppose alpha is situational. Her desire for that guy was stronger than loyalty to the other guy at that particular day.

      • Liz says:

        ” I suppose alpha is situational.”
        Yes, I’ve noticed the definition for alpha is very fluid and relative. This woman’s “alpha” wouldn’t be an alpha to me, I’m sure. Much like SMVs of “9” and “8” and “7” and so forth are relative.

    • Yes. That deserves notice.

  6. Ashley says:

    My guy and I have this thing where we have noticed fat chicks with these really skinny guys all the time. I don’t know if it’s a fetish or what, but yes, fat girls are definitely still getting laid. The truth is though that a lot of guys having sex with them just don’t want to admit it.

    • theasdgamer says:

      Truth. Fatties can get it on with men who lack the confidence to approach attractive women and who lack the skills to build attraction with those women. Low SMV men. Men without better options.

      • Ashley says:

        Lack of confidence and options are part of it, but the other part is that men with better options will likely still have sex with a fat girl if she offers herself. They just won’t brag about it.

      • theasdgamer says:

        Let’s say that a fattie is SMV 3 and the man is an alpha who is spinning plates with a 9 and a couple of 8’s. Oh yeah, sure, he’s gonna jump right on that whale. You’re precious. [chuckle]

      • theasdgamer says:

        A man will typically fakk up to 3 levels lower in SMV. 4 if he’s very drunk. Let’s say that a man is SMV 9. He will bang a 5 if he’s very drunk. No fatties, though. If he’s sober, he will bang 6’s who are throwing themselves at him. He will game 7’s easily and 8’s if he has skill. 9’s if he is very determined and skilled.

      • Eric says:

        It’s the other way around. There are some guys who are into things a high-value woman won’t do, but a low-value one will.

      • theasdgamer says:

        For a high value man, every woman wants to be his slut. For a low value man, every woman wants to be his Madonna.

      • Eric says:

        No they don’t. The SMP is a value-for-value exchange. Women who don’t value men will pick lowlifes or go lezzo. Men who don’t value women will pick worthless ones or turn fag. High-value chooses high-value. The value may vary but the dynamic never does.

      • theasdgamer says:

        You are wrong. You are arguing that water isn’t wet. Women will always pick SMV higher than they are. Women always want a man with higher status because of Hypergamy. Men will dip up to 4 SMV lower for sex. The high value chooses high value trope has been disproved over and over. Bill Clinton (10) and Monica Lewinsky (6), e.g.

      • Liz says:

        “Women always want a man with higher status because of Hypergamy. Men will dip up to 4 SMV lower for sex. The high value chooses high value trope has been disproved over and over. Bill Clinton (10) and Monica Lewinsky (6), e.g.”

        It’s still relative. A 4 value female (4 also relative) is going to assign more value to a male 6 than a female 6 would. Even Clinton above is relative (a 10 in whose estimation? That fat fuck? In what world?)

      • theasdgamer says:

        Status. POTUS. Not for you with a fighter pilot husband, but still high status for lots of women. The ugly troll Kissinger got laid a lot, too.

        I don’t see any reason to link a man’s SMV with a woman’s. A woman with SMV 6 wouldn’t even see a man with SMV 6. A woman will only see men with higher SMVs.

      • Eric says:

        There’s no such thing as female hypergamy. Men and women choose each other for what they value in each other. Liz is right: it’s a relative scale. Misandryist women like Monica Lewinski value power, prestige, and fame and are indifferent to who the man is. The same with those who chase thugs and metrosexuals.

        There has to be an emotional and spiritual bond where one compliments the other for Love to exist. All the other factors like age, looks, wealth, intelligence, sexual skill, &c. can vary from individual to individual but amount to nothing on their own unless both parties share a mutual respect and affection.

      • theasdgamer says:

        No such thing as female hypergamy….righhhhhht. Even my feminist daughter acknowledges the existence of Hypergamy. Only delusional males deny it any more.

      • Eric says:

        Of course feminists believe in hypergamy—that’s where the Gamers got the idea. Just like they copy everything else from feminism.

      • theasdgamer says:

        You don’t read the Bible much, do you?

      • Eric says:

        Show me where the term ‘hypergamy’ appears in the Bible.

      • theasdgamer says:

        First, you show me where the term “Trinity” appears in the Bible.

      • Eric says:

        The term ‘Trinity’ does not appear; but it has been held as Doctrine since the earliest times. The same can’t be said of Hypergamy; it’s a recent innovation promoted by the Churchian Game cultists.

      • theasdgamer says:

        Nice try at reframing, Girly-man. The test was whether something appeared in the Bible. Then you moved the goal posts. Very feminine.

        We see Hypergamy occurring in the Bible when the young Shunammite becomes King David’s concubine. We also see it in the Song of Solomon when the woman lover is attracted to King Solomon.

      • Eric says:

        And I just told you the difference between Doctrinal concepts which don’t appear in the Bible, and Cultish concepts which don’t. The explanation is from the Council of Nicea— which stands on a bit higher spiritual authority than Roissy’s ’16 Commandments of Poon’.

        We see some Biblical events which are re-defined as hypergamy by Churchian Gamers; but it doesn’t apply to all women in the Bible, or all women at large, by any means. How can it be argued that the Virgin Mary was hypergamous? LOL

      • theasdgamer says:

        Are you stupid or just dishonest? You moved the goalposts. Your objection was answered. When that tactic didn’t work, you added another criterion.

      • Eric says:

        No, I’m trying to follow your illogic. You seem to be arguing that a character in a Hebrew love-poem behaved hypergamously, therefore it’s as a well-established a Biblical truth as the Trinity—even though for over 20 centuries no Christian theologian ever bothered to say anything about it.

        Isn’t this the trademark of every cult? “whatever doctrine, new and not before heard of, such an one will perceive to be afterwards brought in by some one man, beside all or contrary to all the saints; let him know that doctrine does not pertain to religion but rather to temptation.”—St. Vincent

      • theasdgamer says:

        Eric, everyone can see that you moved the goalposts. You’re not fooling anyone but yourself.

      • Eric says:

        No one can see any goal-posts, they’re products of your imagination, like hypergamy.

        So why don’t explain for us how Hypergamy is Biblically or Doctrinally based?

    • Oh yeah. I’ve always been on the thin side and if there’s ever a girl hitting on me, she’s almost always overweight. My inbox on OKC was full of first messages from the same. It seems to come down to both sides not having many options and gravitating to each other.

      • theasdgamer says:

        I tried one service, just for fun. Got some hits. If they’re trim, then they’re almost always older; if they’re young, then they’re fatties.

        Re: online dating. My strength is my subcomms. My looks make me barely noticeable to some women. Not movie star good looks (MSGL), but better than average and good enough; probably optimal since I don’t outshine a 7. My subcomms are very sexy. Online dating and Tinder would be a total waste of my time. You need MSGL (face or body) for online dating.

  7. I had pretty good luck online dating. Good luck getting dates, that is, and with some pretty hot girls. Of course, knowing what you’re doing on there helps. Took me a while to figure things out.

    Subcomms…?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s